January242012
rikudera:

basilton:

vampishly:

unlubricated-anal-sex:

textbookenigmatic:

spbell:

So for the love of god, shut the fuck up you prude assholes.

TRUTH.

 i’ve reblogged this before but idc

it’s just a boob
it has nutrition for babies

The most bizarre thing after the Janet Jackson “wardrobe malfunction” incident was someone explaining why it was so inappropriate and why such a large fine was warranted.
They said that a woman’s nipples were not appropriate for children.
A woman’s nipples. Not appropriate for children.

So we can sexualize womens’ bodies in media and advertising, especially their breasts, but if a woman tries to use her breast(s) for their original biologically intended purpose, it’s inappropriate? What is wrong with this picture?

rikudera:

basilton:

vampishly:

unlubricated-anal-sex:

textbookenigmatic:

spbell:

So for the love of god, shut the fuck up you prude assholes.

TRUTH.

 i’ve reblogged this before but idc

it’s just a boob

it has nutrition for babies

The most bizarre thing after the Janet Jackson “wardrobe malfunction” incident was someone explaining why it was so inappropriate and why such a large fine was warranted.

They said that a woman’s nipples were not appropriate for children.

A woman’s nipples. Not appropriate for children.

So we can sexualize womens’ bodies in media and advertising, especially their breasts, but if a woman tries to use her breast(s) for their original biologically intended purpose, it’s inappropriate? What is wrong with this picture?

(Source: ilovecharts, via thefallingtower)

Page 1 of 1